User Tools

Site Tools


2gbaroinputworkaround

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

2gbaroinputworkaround [2012/07/02 08:58]
twdorris
2gbaroinputworkaround [2024/03/15 11:16]
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== 2G Baro Input Workaround ====== 
- 
-The baro input of the 2G ECU may not be compatible with aftermarket sensors. ​ The 2G ECU has a 3.3K ohm pull-down resistor (R39 on 1995 EPROM ECUs), which may (probably will) put more load on the sensor than it can drive properly. 
- 
-For example, a GM 3-bar sensor can only drive this input to 1.76 volts at maximum pressure. The GM 3.3-bar sensor seems to have a bit lower output impedance and will drive the 2G baro input a little higher, but it's still unsuitable. 
- 
-Short of removing that resistor from the ECU (described below), the 2G baro input is suitable for use only with very low impedance sensors (even a 50-ohm output impedance will produce a little over 1% of voltage offset). Since most sensor designs have a resistor in series with its output for protection, the 2G ECU's baro sensor input is probably not suitable for use with most sensors. 
- 
-**OMNIPOWER NOTE:** The [[http://​www.ecmtuning.com/​product_info.php?​cPath=28_30&​products_id=47|OmniPower 4-bar sensor]] that we sell on our website *does* work fine on the 2G baro input. ​ This sensor incorporates a buffer circuit that drives the 2G baro input just fine. 
- 
-**GM MAF CABLE NOTE:** Also note that our GM MAF cable'​s "​baro"​ [[gmmafiatbaro|breakout wire]] includes a buffer circuit as well.  So any sensor connected to a GM MAF cable'​s "​baro"​ wire will work fine as well without having to deal with the 2G ECU's baro input resistor configuration. 
- 
-The 1G baro input doesn'​t seem to suffer from this problem. It has an input impedance similar to the 2G MDP sensor input'​s 100K ohms). 
- 
-**12/​19/​2007:​** Instead of this process, you can also consider using the [[ECUInputData|buffer circuit]]. 
- 
- 
- 
-====== Process ====== 
- 
-If you're really looking to maximize inputs, you can consider removing R39 from the underside of the ECU board. **NOTE:** This is ONLY appropriate for a 1995 EPROM ECU.  It does not work on 96/97 ECUs.  A different resistor may be present on 96/97 ECUs that can be removed like the 95 EPROM ECUs, but we have not spent any time yet trying to identify it. 
- 
-It's best to use a couple small-tip soldering irons for this. Heat 'em up, apply one to each side of the resistor and slide it right off. I'm including a picture of the location of the resistor of interest below. I have verified that this does allow a GM 3bar to drive the baro input just fine. Once you have done that, you can use either the baro or the intake air temp inputs for whatever you want. 
- 
-{{http://​www.dsmlink.com/​images/​forums/​2gbaro.jpg}} 
  
2gbaroinputworkaround.txt ยท Last modified: 2024/03/15 11:16 (external edit)