This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
injdata-lowpwvariance [2011/12/15 05:55] twdorris |
injdata-lowpwvariance [2011/12/15 05:56] twdorris |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
For example, on a set of 1450 cc/min injectors running on gasoline with a 2.0L 4-cylinder engine, you'd expect to idle in the 1.6-1.7 ms range. And as you can see in the next section, the behavior of any given injector down in that range can be very different from the behavior in the 2ms range. It doesn't sound like much of a difference, but it can be as much as a 30-50% difference in some areas. That's huge! That's like having one cylinder running at 14.7:1 and another running at 9:1 with the __same__ pulsewidth. | For example, on a set of 1450 cc/min injectors running on gasoline with a 2.0L 4-cylinder engine, you'd expect to idle in the 1.6-1.7 ms range. And as you can see in the next section, the behavior of any given injector down in that range can be very different from the behavior in the 2ms range. It doesn't sound like much of a difference, but it can be as much as a 30-50% difference in some areas. That's huge! That's like having one cylinder running at 14.7:1 and another running at 9:1 with the __same__ pulsewidth. | ||
+ | |||
Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
^ // Click to enlarge // ^ | ^ // Click to enlarge // ^ | ||
- | This behavior isn't specific to the FIC BM1450s. I'm sure every injector set out there can have this problem. We're operating the injector down in an area where it's really not expected to produce precise flow. | + | To be clear, this behavior isn't specific to the FIC BM1450s. Every injector set out there can have this problem to varying degrees. We're basically operating many of these injectors down in an area where they're really not intended to produce precise flow. |