User Tools

Site Tools


v3vsmaft

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
v3vsmaft [2010/02/13 05:12]
twdorris
v3vsmaft [2024/03/15 11:16] (current)
Line 15: Line 15:
 But with a GM MAF straight to the ECU, you would typically idle around the 500hz. ​ That seems trivial until you consider the next and previous adjustment points provided in ECMLink of 600hz and 400hz... ​ Those are, again, in GM MAF frequencies. ​ They correspond to roughly 70hz and 30hz for a factory sensor. ​ So, effectively you have adjustment points at roughly 0, 10, 30, 50, 70hz and 90hz if you're running a GM MAF straight to the ECU instead of the 0, 50, and 100 you would have with a MAFT or a factory sensor in the same idling conditions. ​ So you get a lot more fine-grained control over the translation when running a GM MAF straight to the ECU. But with a GM MAF straight to the ECU, you would typically idle around the 500hz. ​ That seems trivial until you consider the next and previous adjustment points provided in ECMLink of 600hz and 400hz... ​ Those are, again, in GM MAF frequencies. ​ They correspond to roughly 70hz and 30hz for a factory sensor. ​ So, effectively you have adjustment points at roughly 0, 10, 30, 50, 70hz and 90hz if you're running a GM MAF straight to the ECU instead of the 0, 50, and 100 you would have with a MAFT or a factory sensor in the same idling conditions. ​ So you get a lot more fine-grained control over the translation when running a GM MAF straight to the ECU.
  
-We also have a built-in function to help dial a GM MAF configuration in.  You can read more about it on the [[http://​www.ecmtuning.com/​wiki/​v3mafadjcombft|GM MAF Adj page]].+We also have a built-in function to help dial a GM MAF configuration in.  You can read more about it on the [[https://​www.ecmtuning.com/​wiki/​v3mafadjcombft|GM MAF Adj page]].
  
  
  
v3vsmaft.1266055933.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2010/02/13 05:12 by twdorris