gmiateffect
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
gmiateffect [2009/09/11 06:17] twdorris |
gmiateffect [2024/03/15 11:16] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Despite the large swing in air temperature, the GM MAS reading was nearly identical between the two logs. Fuel trim variation was less than 1% between them. | Despite the large swing in air temperature, the GM MAS reading was nearly identical between the two logs. Fuel trim variation was less than 1% between them. | ||
| - | [[http://www.ecmtuning.com/images/forums/gmmafiatdata/gmmaf-iat-cold-clip.elg|IAT near 65F]] \\ | + | [[https://www.ecmtuning.com/images/forums/gmmafiatdata/gmmaf-iat-cold-clip.elg|IAT near 65F]] \\ |
| - | [[http://www.ecmtuning.com/images/forums/gmmafiatdata/gmmaf-iat-hot-clip.elg|IAT near 165F]] | + | [[https://www.ecmtuning.com/images/forums/gmmafiatdata/gmmaf-iat-hot-clip.elg|IAT near 165F]] |
| Hopefully this provides some reassurance to folks that the GM MAF sensors really do not require and would not benefit from additional IAT compensation. In fact, since the GM MAS signal is already accurate as air temperature changes (see datalogs), providing IAT compensation would actually mess the signal up. | Hopefully this provides some reassurance to folks that the GM MAF sensors really do not require and would not benefit from additional IAT compensation. In fact, since the GM MAS signal is already accurate as air temperature changes (see datalogs), providing IAT compensation would actually mess the signal up. | ||
gmiateffect.1252664265.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/09/11 06:17 by twdorris
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
